Lord’s Day, Vol. 9 No. 46
One World System
Genesis 11:1, 4 (KJV) And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. 4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
The drive towards a one-world government is the epitome of man’s rebellion against his Creator. The LORD made this observation in Genesis 11:6, “And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.” Not too long ago in Genesis 6, when the hearts of men were only evil continually, it grieved the heart of God and He had to destroy the world with a global flood. Five chapters down, the descendants of Noah were again totally corrupt, they rejected God’s rule and built a great tower as a symbol of man’s supremacy without God. Man, at whatever point in history, in his depraved and corrupt condition, rejects God’s sovereignty and goes about in his own wisdom to establish his own rule in the way he thinks he knows best — a one-world government.
Strong evidence suggests that the current or coming crises are neither due to mismanagement nor the result of ignorance but planned! There exists a global force that acts to bring forth a new global economic system code-named The New World Order (NWO). A group of global elites has been pushing for the NWO for a long time now.
In his book “The Global Manipulators”, author Robert Eringer published his extensive investigations made since 1975 to show the covert machinations of an organization called the Bilderberg Group. Existing since the 1950s, it is a gathering of the elite and the wealthy “who’s-who” of every Western nation, including bankers, industrialists, politicians, and leaders of giant multinational corporations. Eringer wrote, “Their annual meetings take place at a different location each year, go unannounced, their debates unreported, their decisions unknown.” He also interviewed a man called Stanley Rittenhouse of the Liberty Lobby of Washington DC, who explained “the existence of a Jewish-communist conspiracy to rule the world by way of a ‘New World Order’, whose eventual goal is one-world government”.
Eringer explained the origins of the Bilderberg Group. “It all goes back to the Illuminati, a secret society/fraternity formed in Bavaria in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, based on the philosophical ideals of Plato. John Ruskin, ‘a secret disciple of the Illuminati’ and a professor of art and philosophy at Oxford University in the 1870s, revived those ideals … Cecil Rhodes, a student and devoted fan of Ruskin, … formed a secret society in association with a group of Cambridge men who shared the same ideals. This society, which was later to become the original Round Table Group, was formed on 5 February 1881 … Bilderberg evolved directly from the ‘satanic-communist’ Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations … relationship.” The Council on Foreign Relations is considered one of America’s most influential think-tank on US foreign policy and international affairs.
In the 1960s, when Japan and Europe were rising powers and the US dollar eroded in its power, a new “enforcer” David Rockefeller came up with the concept of a Trilateral Commission. According to US Senator Barry Goldwater, “the Trilateral Commission represents a skilled, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centres of power — political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical”. In his book, “With No Apologies”, he added, “What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.”
This was exactly the call of Pope Benedict XVI in his encyclical letter released on the eve of the July 2009 G8 Summit of world leaders and three days before he met US President Barak Obama at the Vatican. Reporting on 9 July 2009, BBC News said, “The Pope has called for reform of the United Nations and financial bodies, giving them the ‘real teeth’ needed to tackle economic and social injustice. Benedict XVI said the blind pursuit of profit and economic mismanagement had ‘wreaked havoc’ on the global economy. The market, said the Pope, must not become the place where the strong prevail over the weak … A reformed UN should strive for disarmament, food security and environmental protection.”
In his encyclical letter, which the BBC described as the highest form of papal teaching, the Pope called for “a reform of the United Nations Organisation, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth … there is urgent need of a true world political authority”.
The timing of the call by the leader of 1.2 billion Roman Catholics worldwide on the eve of the G8 meeting and just prior to meeting the leader of the world’s largest national economy, the US, was most significant. It sent a strong message that the One-World Government had to come to pass.
The plan of the New World Order is to re-organise the world into 10 economic zones — each with its own leader — which will correspond to the 10 horns/10 toes mentioned in the Bible. We have read of a plan to form an Asean Community by 2015. The article, “Repositioning Asean in a new world order”, dated 24 February 2011, was written by Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who was then Asean chairman.
Economic unity is the precursor of political unity. What is the proof that a regional and eventually a world currency can be viable? In his book “America For Sale”, author Jerome Corsi described what he called “the plan to destroy the dollar”. He wrote, “Columbia University economics professor Robert Mundell, widely regarded as the ‘father of the euro’, has argued for decades that national-state currencies, including the dollar, need to give way to a new official world currency. For his work in defining regional markets as the ‘optimal currency area’ instead of nation-states, Mundell won the Nobel Prize in economics in 1999.
“Mundell’s argument was that nation-states are not optimal currency areas because nation-state borders are artificial constraints imposed on the globe to create ethnic or historical divisions that do not necessarily represent how international markets operate.
To understand the concept, Mundell cited former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker’s frequently quoted dictum, ‘A global economy needs a global currency.’ “Free-trade advocates see the elimination of nation-state currencies as removing yet another barrier to international trade, much as eliminating tariffs and customs controls removes other international trade barriers. Furthermore, one-world currency advocates believe a worldwide monetary policy established by a one-world central bank would be more stable, in that individual nation-states would no longer be free to set interest rates in order to benefit national markets … Advocates of a one-world currency believe abandoning national currencies would facilitate flows of private capital across borders, thereby stimulating economic growth across the globe. Finally, establishing a one-world currency would eliminate the possibilities of speculators attacking nation-state currencies.”
Mundell “further anticipated that the emergence of an official world currency would begin with the International Monetary Fund accepting deposits of gold, dollars, or euros in exchange for credit balances denominated in credit balances defined by IMF Special Drawing Rights, or SDRs. These IMF credits would then serve as the beginning of a one- world international currency that could be used by all countries to hold their foreign-exchange reserves”.
Debts will be erased when a new currency is issued. To solve the American debt problem, could there be a plan for a North American Currency Union which calls for an economic and monetary merger of Canada, US and Mexico. Implementation would involve the three countries giving up their current currency units (US dollar, Canadian dollar, and Mexican peso) and adopting a new one, created specifically for this purpose. The hypothetical currency for the union is most often referred to as the Amero. Modeled after the common European Union currency (the euro), the concept is argued to be a natural extension of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). Some observers believe the governments of these three countries are already taking steps to implement such a currency, as part of a North American Union (NAU).
As mentioned earlier, we have also read of an Asean plan to move towards regionalization by 2015 and possibly a common currency. Near and far, there are signs of a movement towards a one-world currency, precipitated by an impending currency crisis that will come as a result of the crack in the sovereign bond market of first-world nations. Could the one-world currency be the precursor of the mark of the beast prophesied in Revelation 13:16-17? “And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” Today, the formation of the One World System speeds along by way of digitization and the implementation of 5G and 6G. Surely, we can see Jesus’ coming drawing very nigh!
Yours lovingly,
Pastor Lek Aik Wee