There is reward awaiting the faithful worker. He that sow in tears shall reap with joy. Indeed, he that ploughs should plough in hope. There is an eternal reward but also there is a reward for the faithful servant of God on earth. In the process of threshing of crushing, the straw is crushed and the grain is collected. Just like the worker who would receive his wages for his day’s labour, the man who ploughs and thresheth in God’s vineyard receives reward for his labour.

The law of just compensation for the worker is not just a human law but it is also God’s law as given Deuteronomy 25:4 Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn. The owner of the oxen who expects the oxen to plow the field must also ensure the oxen is properly fed. The oxen is to be treated such, even so the man.

Here are three questions that beg answers in the negative! Which soldier serves at any time at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard and does not eat of its fruit? Who tends the flock and does not feed on the milk of the flock? For the shepherd to feed on the milk of the flock he tends, it is perfectly legitimate and natural for the servant of Christ to be a partaker in the work in which he engages. The Lord is a just paymaster, The Apostle Paul believes that a worker was “worthy of his hire” (1 Timothy 5:18). [Zodhiates]

When Paul and Barnabas ministered in Corinth with the establishment of the church, they did not want support from those in Corinth although they had every right to do so. There were many Corinthians who were materially affluent. They did not want any misunderstanding and be accused of coming to Corinth to enrich themselves. Instead, they worked with their hands as tent-makers. [Zodhiates]

The Apostle Paul states clearly that as a servant of God, he has the right to marry and to have his wife supported also by the church as he goes about in the work of the ministry. The fact that he is not married does not mean that he does not have the basic privilege to have a help-meet in a marital union. And by not excercising his right to marriage does not mean that others has choose to remain unmarried.

If we have worked, should we not be entitled to eat and drink? Surely. As every other human being, these basic needs need to be maintained. Yet, the Apostle Paul did not insist his basic right to food and drink to maintain human life. He did not insist even on his right. He explained in Romans 14:21 It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.

The Apostle Paul was criticized and questioned for living a sacrificial life. He did not marry although he has every right to do so. He wanted to wholeheartedly serve the Lord. And he also did not receive support from the Corinthian Church although he founded the church in Corinth and the Corinthian Christians were his “work in the Lord.”

The Apostle Paul reasoned with the church in Corinth that he was sent by Jesus Christ to preach the gospel to them. The fact that they are in the Lord attest his apostleship. God’s grace came upon them to open their hearts and to save them. Why did he have to speak thus? Because the believers in Corinth were resisting to amend their ways according to the counsel that the Apostle Paul was giving to them. Instead, they have chosen to undermine his authority by raising in question his God-given mandate, for their spiritual welfare.