Before we leave this proverb, there is another thought implicit here that should be brought out, especially in these days of widespread compromise among professing Christians. “Equivocation is half-way to lying, and lying is the whole way to hell!” To this Spurgeon added, “but by a carefully constructed equivocation truth is murdered.”

To honour the King is the duty of all subjects, as well as the command of God. To honour the King of Kings is the highest and best duty of all. The former brings temporal praise, the other eternal peace. This proverb also applies to every day life. One who pleases his master, his boss, will receive recognition now, but the one who pleases THE KING receives an hundredfold now, and in the world to come eternal life.

What is it that in the midst of fools is made known? Is it folly or wisdom? The word wisdom and both verbs are feminine. It is thus that most modern versions contradict one another, depending on which option they choose. RSV says, but it (wisdom) is not known in the heart of fools. The RSV footnote shows it followed the Greek (LXX), but adds “Heb. lacks not.” The NRSV, reflecting the very latest scholarship, still inserts not known, while adding a note that not only the Hebrew lacks not, but also Greek and Syriac versions! NASV reads, but in the bosom of fools it (wisdom) is made known. Yet, the NAV (with Apocrypha) reads, but in the bosom of fools it is unknown! Surely Bibles that contradict one another cannot be the Word of God! Since folly is also feminine (14:24), there is no problem with the verb. The simple contrast in this proverb must be between the wise person who shows wisdom, and fools, who only display their folly!

The faith that justified Abraham was the same faith that justified Paul. Likewise, the true saints under the Old Covenant, lived on the sincere milk of the Word, and were nourished thereby, whatever the measure of their grasp of the fullness of its truth was. In more recent times, many individuals boasted, and denominations claimed, that their creeds were based on the Bible alone. Sadly, their practice does not support many of those claims. What Satan began with, Yea, hath God said, is now, for many, Yea, God has not said!

Because our readings are primarily devotional, we do not often digress into strictly matters of textual criticism. Such discussions are rather technical and may seem remote for the average reader’s needs. They seem rather involved, but they show how the Words of God can be corrupted. Allow this departure on 14:32, because it does illustrate how subtle changes are introduced into God’s Word unobserved by most new version readers.

In this verse there are two more different words for poor (14:20, 21, 23). The first means thin (Joseph’s poor kine). These poor are so stricken with poverty; but they are not responsible for their condition. The one who oppresses them. therefore, reproaches his Maker. The second word for poor is often translated needy (30:14; 31:9, 20). These poor must resort to begging. Could this be why the rabbis taught that God created the poor for the benefit of the rich so that they would have someone to give alms to?